Scientist Says He Found Definitive Proof That God Exists.

 on Tuesday, 7 June 2016  

One of the most respected scientists of today says he has found evidence of the action of a force "that governs everything."

scientists say they have proof god exists for certain

The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God. The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world.

To to come to his conclusions, the physicist made ​​use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “.

Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe.

After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”.

“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”


“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”

Scientist Says He Found Definitive Proof That God Exists. 4.5 5 SEEKER Tuesday, 7 June 2016 One of the most respected scientists of today says he has found evidence of the action of a force &...

15 comments:

  1. Let me guess, he's going to write a book.. Instead of a peer-reviews paper...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. um, this report isn't a peer reviewed paper

      Delete
    2. no joke Unknown ... that was the point

      Delete
    3. wonder if he is being funded by kent hovind that evil scam artist.

      Delete
  2. Beautiful speech about higher physics. He mentioned 'super' physics but not supernatural physics. When he referred to the 'mind of god', he was using the term 'god' as Einstein did - that is representing a set of rules or laws that explain the working of the universe. Not "GOD" as in religion. No GOD, no "definitive proof". That is merely the misunderstanding of the idiot who wrote this article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yet, you probably believe Darwin's THEORY of Evolution as fact. The definition of Theory that I hold this ridiculous belief is: a guess a conjecture.

      Delete
  3. Likely not misunderstanding, but gross irresponsible twisting of words, preying on click bait tendencies and the general laziness of most people to check the source to spread fake news online, just for the views.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The universe and the creation of life are miracles. I heard one wise saying that we were created so god could have someone appreciate his miraculous creation. As a physicist myself, my advice... appreciate it, all things big and small, be thankful, don't judge, and always be kind.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm now selling cars that read your mind and take you where you need to go no thought necessary better yet they take you where should go....send a $10,000 dollar advance to*******

    ReplyDelete
  6. The classic argument unfolded and further identifying hidden and unseen forces that dictate or unstick our conceptions of life in order to ensure sustainable proof that humans need the term "God" and will continue to prove that. Those that continually try to disprove the notion have learned all they need to know about the universe and are dead to the shaping of the plane they exist on. Simple - destroy god, get life. Understand god - have life. The paradox of it all is that both have both and neither at any given moment.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unfortunately there still is no evidence that any gods exist, except in peoples' minds.

    ReplyDelete
  8. bah he is confused about what is math. please tell him that math is describing the physic using exact description as when we say that bring a long stick as what my friend own. you won't bring a stick at the lenght of the mentioned stick because a long stick is a stick which is higher than 40 cm then there are illimited possibilities and we can't guess the exact possibility (at least yet). but if we say my friend have a 60 cm leghth stick bring for me a stick have the same length then you can get a stick at the same length also instead of saying a red T-shirt we can say a T-shirt reject photons which have 0.7 um

    ReplyDelete
  9. when you are governed(and you comply) by set of rules, there is order, ergo big bang is very unlikely

    ReplyDelete
  10. you can't have order out of chaos without some type of intelligence stepping in and creating the order

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © THEIST vs ATHEIST. All Rights Reserved.   Prof. Van Heizen Theme by CB Design.  Published By Kaizen Template - Support KaizenThemes

DISCLAIMER This site is designed for educational purposes only and is not engaged in rendering any advice, tangible service or professional service.